Buy a subscription

Home Contact Sitemap login Checkout

Farming Smarter

Farming Smarter
  • Home
  • Who We Are
    • Who We Are
    • Staff Directory
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • What We Do
    • What We Do
    • Agronomy Research
    • Commercial Innovation
    • Field Tested
    • Knowledge & Network
  • What We Offer
    • What We Offer
    • Sponsorship Packages
      • Sponsorship Packages
      • Australia & New Zealand 2026 Technical Tour Sponsorships
    • Events
      • Events
      • Agronomy Battles Event Series
    • Research Projects
      • Research Projects
      • Agronomy Research Projects
      • Field Tested Projects
      • Commercial Innovation Projects
    • Subscriptions
      • Subscriptions
      • FS Agronomy Subscription
      • FS Digital Subscription
    • Smart Partner Program
    • Speakers
  • Get Involved
    • Get Involved
    • Jobs
    • Sponsorship
    • I want to help!
    • With On-farm Research
    • With Product Testing
    • With Small Plot Research
    • Internship Opportunities
    • Volunteer!
    • Support Research!
  • Learning Resources
    • Learning Resources
    • Conservation Agronomy
    • Magazine
    • Online Classroom (CEU)
    • News Articles
    • Videos
    • Publications & Reports
      • Publications & Reports
      • Published Papers
      • Research Reports
    • Podcasts
    • 360 Videos
Print This Page

Kochia Management in Pulses

Kochia Management in Pulses

A Collaborative Prairie Initiative

Project Abstract

Pulse crops offer a myriad of benefits to soil and following crops when included in crop rotations. However, they are significantly negatively impacted by weed competition yet weed control remains a challenge in the Prairies. This study enlists researchers across the Prairies to overcome that challenge and identify successful weed management strategies for pulse growers in Saskatchewan, Alberta, and Manitoba.

This collaborative study puts an important focus on kochia management, as its fast-evolving herbicide resistance continues make it a formidable opponent that growers face even beyond fields of pulse crops. Farming Smarter will contribute to the creation of a framework for successful multi-factor kochia management programs in pulses through five projects to identify valuable candidates for herbicidal weed control, demonstrate effective kochia control systems in saline areas, and determine the impact of new cultural practices, like mowing, on kochia seed production and seedbed inputs.

The final step of this study is to prepare economic evaluations to provide farmers with practices they know will work and won't drain the bank.

Project Details

Timeline 2025-2030
Principal Investigator: Dr. Steve Shirtliffe
University of Saskatchewan
Project Contact: Lewis Baarda
Farming Smarter
Funded By:

Saskatchewan Pulse Growers



Project Objectives

  • Provide an experimental framework for the evaluation of weed control treatments for kochia in pulse crops
  • Optimize and evaluate herbicide candidates for the control of kochia in pulses
  • Evaluate and demonstrate the effect of weed control systems on kochia populations in natural saline patches
  • Field evaluation and coordinated demonstration of patch mowing for kochia control


Determine a biologically effective dose for controlling kochia with metribuzin

Methodology

The objective of this trial is to evaluate the metribuzin treatment rates with the best pulse tolerance and efficacy on kochia. Treatments will be responsive from year-to-year and adapt to the results we see.

Timeline

2025 Locate sites with inherent kochia patches
2026 Undergo greenhouse study (1.2) -> use rates for 1st field season
2027

2nd year greenhouse and field season.
Study complete

Locations

Lethbridge, AB

Treatments

  • Treatment list of metribuzin dose rates will be based on a preceding greenhouse study and will be updated for the 2026 field season

Measurements

  • Visual crop injury (7-14, 21-28, and 56+ DAT)
  • Visual weed control (7-14, 21-28, and 56+ DAT)
  • UAV imaging at the same timings
  • Weed biomass
  • Crop yield
  • Crop density



Efficacy Screening of new herbicide options in pulse crops

Methodology

The objective of this trial is to identify which combination of fall applied + in-crop herbicides is best for combating kochia in pulse crops.

Timeline

2024 Fall-applied herbicide treatments
2025 1st study year, apply year 2 fall treatments
2026

Complete 2nd study year

Locations

Lethbridge, AB

Treatments

  • Untreated Check
  • Fall IPCO Bifecta EZ (880 ml/ha(-1) = 68 + 305 g ai/ha(-1) of flumioxazin and metribuzin, respectively)
  • Fall IPCO Bifecta EZ (1250 ml/ha(-1) = 97 + 434 g ai/ha(-1) of flumioxazin and metribuzin, respectively)
  • Fall Fierce MTZ (1.17 l/ha(-1) = 68 + 211 + 90 g ai/ha(-1) of flumioxazin, metribuzin and pyroxasulfone, respectively)
  • Fall Fierce MTZ (1.75 l/ha(-1) = 105 + 314 + 134 g ai/ha(-1) of flumioxazin, metribuzin and pyroxasulfone, respectively)
  • Fall Fierce EZ (440 ml/ha(-1) = 70 + 90 g ai/ha(-1) of flumioxazin and pyroxasulfone, respectively)
  • Fall Fierce EZ (660 ml/ha(-1) = 105 + 134 g ai/ha(-1) of flumioxazin and pyroxasulfone, respectively)
  • Fall Valtera (148 ml/ha(-1) = 70 g ai/ha(-1) of flumioxazin)
  • Fall Valtera (224 ml/ha(-1) = 107 g ai/ha(-1) of flumioxazin)
  • Fall Sencor 480F (700 ml/ha(-1) = 335 g ai/ha(-1) of metribuzin)
  • Fall Sencor 480F (850 ml/ha(-1) = 489 g ai/ha(-1) of metribuzin)
  • Spring IPCO Bifecta EZ (880 ml/ha(-1) = 68 + 305 g ai/ha(-1) of flumioxazin and metribuzin, respectively)
  • Spring Valtera (148 ml/ha(-1) = 70 g ai/ha(-1) of flumioxazin)

*Spring applications will be applied 7 days before seeding.

Measurements

  • Lentil emergence counts
  • Lentil phytotoxicity ratings
  • Weed control ratings (by species)
  • Weed biomass (by species) at 56+ DAE
  • Lentil yield
  • Crop density
  • UAV imaging
  • Visual crop injury (7-14, 21-28, and 56+ DAE)
  • Visual weed control (same as crop)


Determine effect of weed control systems on kochia control in natural saline patches

Methodology

This study will use strip trials to determine the impact of herbicide when ran perpendicular to the salinity gradient of the patches. Reps in a field trial are dependent on the individual kochia patch gradient.

Timeline

2025 Identify and characterize locations for kochia patches
2026

Develop initial protocol, EM38 + soil testing, 1st study year

Locations

Lethbridge, AB
Stirling, AB

Treatments

  • Untreated Check
  • Bifecta EZ (880 ml/ha(-1))
  • Fierce MTZ (1170 ml/ha(-1))
  • Fierce EZ (660 ml/ha(-1))
  • Sencore 480F (700 ml/ha(-1)) + Treflan EC (2989 ml/ha(-1))
  • Valtera EZ (222 ml/ha(-1))

*All treatments will also include a pre-seed burnoff in spring

Measurements









Soil applied herbicide layering in saline vs. non-saline soils for herbicide resistant kochia control

Methodology

This trial includes two studies, one that focuses on lentils and another on barley to identify any difference in efficacy of layered soil applied herbicides for kochia control in both saline and non-saline soils, and to identify crop tolerance to layered soil applied herbicides. This will allow us to determine if dual herbicide layering applications are effective at reducing kochia populations and if these management strategies should vary depending on soil salinity.

Timeline

2025 Initiate first study with fall treatment applications to lentils
2026 Lentil crop growing season and fall treatment applications on barley to initiate second study
2027 Barley crop and lentil crop growing seasons (2nd study)
2028

Barley crop growing season (2nd study)

Locations

Lethbridge, AB

Treatments

  • Untreated Check
  • Edge
  • Edge + Fierce EZ
  • Edge + Zidua
  • Edge + Valtera EZ
  • Rival 10G
  • Rival 10G + Fierce EZ
  • Rival 10G + Zidua
  • Rival 10G + Valtera EZ

*All treatments will also include a pre-seed burnoff in spring

Measurements - 2026

*Data collection will be adjusted for the 2027 season

  • Soil testing for salinity (in both suspected saline and non-saline soils)
  • Rainfall events/weather data
  • Seeding date
  • Application dates
  • Plant density
  • Weed biomass (at full podding)
  • Phytotoxicity ratings (at 7-14, 21-28, and 56 DAE)
  • Weed control efficacy ratings, of each species (same as phytotoxicty)
  • UAV imaging (same as phytotoxicity)
  • Lentil yield
  • Dockage
  • Economic analysis



Field efficacy trials of kochia patch mowing over a 4-5-year period

Methodology

The objective of this trial is to assess the efficacy of mowing kochia prior to seed set as a means of finding new cultural practices.

Timeline

2025 Identify producer cooperators and develop protocol, collect baseline data and conduct 1st mow
Spring 2026

EM38 mapping and soil sampling prior to seeding

Summer 2026 Kochia counts and UAV imaging prior to mowing(s)
2026-2029

Continue annual data collection and mowing

Locations

Lethbridge, AB

Treatments

  • Mowing
    • Must occur before seed set; may be repeated within season if practical
  • Management
    • Producers can continue normal weed management in the mowed area

*Each year, mowed areas will be marked with GPS records. Patch sizes may vary annually and between locations

Measurements

  • UAV imagery to track kochia populations in-field
  • EM38 mapping for soil salinity
  • Weed populations
  • Crop stages (day of mowing)
  • Weed stages (same as crop stages)
  • Soil sampling
  • Mowing dates
  • Crop rotation history
  • Herbicide application history


Results

Sign in to view Results and Recommendations

Results

Return in Spring 2026 for preliminary results from the first year of research

Recommendations

Return after the project's conclusion for recommendations from our research


Media











Farming Smarter

211034 Hwy 512, Lethbridge County, AB
T1J 5N9 Canada

Quick Links

Who We Are

What We Do

What We Offer

Get Involved

Learning Resources

More

Staff Directory

Contact

DONATE

Copyright © Farming Smarter 2025. All rights reserved | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions